GTM strategy and planning
ICP and segmentation, partner strategy, and quarterly GTM plans that tie to pipeline and revenue.
Strategic revenue operations leadership, without the full-time bet.
One named lead who owns the CRM, the funnel definitions, and the reporting on an ongoing retainer, for B2B and PE-backed companies on HubSpot. Strategy, hands-on, or both.
A revenue operations lead who owns the system, not a consultant who writes a deck about it. Fractional means part-time. It does not mean partial. The retainer covers the three things that fall through the cracks when nobody owns them.
The CRM, the properties, the integrations. One person accountable for whether the data can be trusted, in HubSpot and in whatever feeds it (Salesforce, Salesloft, Apollo, 6sense).
Lifecycle and lead stages, qualification criteria, handoff rules. Written down once and used the same way by marketing and sales.
Multi-touch attribution, lifecycle conversion rates, pipeline velocity, campaign ROI against closed revenue. Dashboards that update in real time and get read in the board meeting.
Ongoing ownership on a monthly retainer, not a project with an end date. Some weeks that is hands on the keyboard in HubSpot. Some weeks it is the GTM plan, the board number, or the acquisition integration.
ICP and segmentation, partner strategy, and quarterly GTM plans that tie to pipeline and revenue.
Hands-on build and optimization across CRM, automations, reporting, and integrations.
Shared definitions, routing, SLA design, and meeting cadence to keep both teams moving.
Conversion analysis, velocity, cycle time, and recommendations that improve the numbers.
What to keep, what to cut, and how it all connects to HubSpot.
Pre- and post-acquisition integration, standardization across portfolio companies, and board-ready reporting.
Most RevOps engagements end with a document. This one ends with a system someone is accountable for. Five places that shows up.
| A RevOps consultant | A RevOps owner | |
|---|---|---|
| What you have at the end | A deck of recommendations | A working system, with the person who built it still running it |
| Who builds the recommendation | Someone who hands it to your team | The same person, that week |
| When the CRM actually changes | After the project, if someone picks it up | The week the gap is found |
| Who it answers to | Whoever signed the SOW | Marketing and sales at the same time |
| What happens when they leave | The knowledge leaves with them | Definitions and workflows written down, still running |
A senior revenue operations lead on a part-time retainer instead of a full-time hire. They own the CRM, the funnel definitions, and the reporting, and are accountable to marketing and sales at the same time.
Three triggers cover most of it: the sole marketer or ops lead just left and the CRM went with them; growth outran the setup and the reporting stopped being trusted; or an acquisition left you with more than one portal and no single owner.
Yes, and it's usually the same three problems: more than one portal after an acquisition, reporting the board doesn't trust, and a GTM plan that was built for the last stage of the business. We integrate, standardize, and report against a defined revenue engine.
Yes. When Salesforce is the system of record, we build and maintain the two-way sync so HubSpot runs marketing and the relationship layer while Salesforce keeps pipeline and revenue. We configure AI agents and reporting in either platform.
The Growth Gap Report is twelve questions and about 3 minutes. You get a score on data integrity, funnel visibility, automation coverage, and reporting trust. A useful starting point, whether you move now or later.